Evolocumab Treatment in Pediatric Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Pooled Data From Three Open-Label Studies.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) have an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and difficulty meeting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated pooled safety and efficacy data from 3 studies in pediatric patients with HoFH treated with the PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) monoclonal antibody inhibitor evolocumab. METHODS: Patients with HoFH aged 10 to 17 years received treatment with open-label evolocumab 420 mg subcutaneously monthly or biweekly in the TAUSSIG, RAMAN, or HAUSER-OLE clinical studies. All patients received background statins with or without ezetimibe. Study duration ranged from 12 to 260 weeks. The primary end point was treatment-emergent adverse events per 100 patient-years. Efficacy end points were changes from baseline to week 12 in lipids and PCSK9. RESULTS: Of the 39 patients in the pooled analysis, 69.2% were males, median age was 13.0 years, and 79.5% (31/39) had genotyped HoFH with LDLR pathogenic variants. Overall, median exposure to evolocumab was 18.2 (Q1, Q3: 3.0, 18.5) months. Treatment-emergent adverse events with an exposure-adjusted patient incidence rate of ≥5% were upper respiratory tract infection (6.6%), influenza (5.2%), and acne (5.0%) per 100 patient-years. Exposure-adjusted patient incidence of serious treatment-emergent adverse events was 13.3% per 100 patient-years. Excluding 4 patients receiving lipoprotein apheresis, week 12 median percentage change from baseline in LDL-C was -2.9% (Q1, Q3: -21.7, 1.5); however, 42.9% (15/35) of patients achieved ≥15% reduction in LDL-C from baseline. Residual LDLR (LDL receptor) activity was not associated with a reduction in LDL-C. CONCLUSIONS: In this pooled data analysis from 3 studies in pediatric patients with HoFH, evolocumab was well tolerated, with no new safety signals reported. These safety findings are consistent with findings from previous studies of evolocumab. Patients showed marked variability in LDL-C reduction. Results from this pooled analysis support guidelines suggesting a trial of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy regardless of estimated residual LDLR function. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01624142, NCT03403374, and NCT02624869.

Ezetimibe alleviates acetic acid-induced ulcerative colitis in rats: targeting the Akt/NF-κB/STAT3/CXCL10 signaling axis.

OBJECTIVE: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a relapsing inflammatory health state posing significant worldwide problems. Ezetimibe is a cholesterol-lowering drug having anti-inflammatory and pleiotropic properties. METHODS: Twenty-four rats were classified into four groups (n = 6). Group (I) was considered negative control. Acetic acid (AA) was instilled intrarectally in groups (II-IV). Group (II) was considered UC-control. Groups (III and IV) were orally treated with Ezetimibe (5 and 10 mg/kg/day; 14 days). KEY FINDING: AA installation resulted in severe macroscopic colonic lesions associated with elevations in the relative colon weight, the wet weight/length ratio and oxidative stress markers in the colorectum tissues. UC-control rats showed significantly elevated colorectal tissue CXCL10 and STAT3 gene expression. Akt, phosphorylated Akt, phosphorylated STAT3, TNF-α, IL-6 and NF-κB were expressively upregulated in the UC-control group. AA installation also resulted in significant histopathological alterations in the colorectum tissues of UC-control rats along with increasing the colorectal tissues' immunohistochemical iNOS expression. Collectively, these data suggest activation of the Akt/NF-κB/STAT3/CXCL10 signaling axis. Ezetimibe treatment significantly ameliorated all the aforementioned parameters. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to elucidate the modulatory actions of Ezetimibe against oxidative stress and inflammation associated with AA-induced UC in rats. Ezetimibe treatment mitigates UC via downregulation of the Akt/NF-κB/STAT3/CXCL10 signaling axis.

Moderate-Intensity Statins Plus Ezetimibe vs. High-Intensity Statins After Coronary Revascularization: A Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Whether moderate-intensity statins plus ezetimibe could be an alternative to high-intensity statins in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is unclear. We compared the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients receiving moderate-intensity statins plus ezetimibe vs. high-intensity statins after a coronary revascularization procedure using data from a large cohort study. METHOD: Population-based cohort study using nationwide medical insurance data from Korea. Study participants (n = 20,070) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016, and received moderate-intensity statins (atorvastatin 10-20 mg or rosuvastatin 5-10 mg) plus ezetimibe (n = 922) or high-intensity statins (atorvastatin 40-80 mg or rosuvastatin 20 mg; n = 19,148). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI), hospitalization for stroke, or revascularization. RESULTS: At 12 months, the incidence rates of the primary outcome were 138.0 vs. 154.0 per 1000 person-years in the moderate-intensity stains plus ezetimibe and the high-intensity statins group, respectively. The fully adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for the primary outcome was 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.42; p = 0.43). The multivariable-adjusted HR for a composite of cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization for MI, or hospitalization for stroke was 1.05 (95% CI 0.74-1.47; p = 0.80). During follow-up, the proportion of patients maintaining their initial lipid-lowering therapy was significantly higher in the moderate-intensity statins plus ezetimibe group than in the high-intensity statins group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing a coronary revascularization procedure who received moderate-intensity statins plus ezetimibe showed similar rates of major adverse cardiovascular events as patients who received high-intensity statins.

Impacts of ezetimibe on risks of various types of cancers: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Ezetimibe is a widely used medication to reduce the plasma cholesterol level, particularly low-density lipoprotein level. However, its impact on cancer remains controversial. Here, its impacts on risks of various types of cancers were meta-analyzed. METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched and randomized controlled trials with followed up for at least 24 weeks were selected and included. The experimental group was defined as those patients treated with ezetimibe alone or with other medications, and the control group was defined as those who received a placebo or the matched medication. The number of new cancer cases or cancer-related deaths was extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (version 5.3). RESULTS: Nine trials enrolling 35 222 patients were included in the analyses. Compared with the control group, ezetimibe increased the number of new intestine cancer patients [relative risk (RR), 1.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.67; P = 0.03] and had a trend to increase the number of new breast cancer patients (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.98-1.98; P = 0.07). There was no significant difference in new hepatobiliary cancer, prostate cancer, skin cancer or cancer of other sites. Ezetimibe did not significantly increase the risk of new cancer in total (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96-1.11; P = 0.38), cancer-related death (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.98-1.26; P = 0.10) or cancer events (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.97-1.12; P = 0.30). In terms of lipid-lowering effect, ezetimibe significantly reduced total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. CONCLUSION: Ezetimibe may increase the risk of intestine cancer and has a trend of increasing the risk of breast cancer. There is no evidence to support that it increases or decreases the risk of other types.

Lifestyle versus ezetimibe plus lifestyle in patients with biopsy-proven non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LISTEN): A double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The LISTEN trial (ClinicalTrial.gov accession: NCT01950884) is a phase IV 52 weeks double blind parallel randomized controlled trial that evaluated the effect of ezetimibe plus lifestyle and dietary intervention (eze) vs. lifestyle and dietary intervention alone (placebo) on progression and complications of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) evaluated by liver histology. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients with NASH ascertained by histology were randomly allocated on the two study groups and subjected to a follow-up of 52 weeks, when they underwent a second liver biopsy. Main composite end point (EP) was based on the histological improvement in the severity of NASH. Thirty patients completed the study, Eze treatment was not able to improve the primary EP in comparison with placebo, with and odds ratio of 1.029 (0.18-6.38), p = 0.974. Treatment emergent adverse events registered during the study were not more prevalent in the treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: ezetimibe administered on top of lifestyle and dietary modification failed to improve the histology of NASH in comparison with lifestyle and dietary modification alone. TRIAL ACCESSION NUMBER: ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01950884.

Misdiagnosis of sitosterolemia in a patient as Evans syndrome and familial hypercholesterolemia.

Sitosterolemia is a rare form of dyslipidemia that has diverse clinical manifestations, and insufficient knowledge of the disease frequently leads to a delay in diagnosis. We report a case of sitosterolemia in a 26-year-old Chinese woman, characterized by anemia, thrombocytopenia, persistent hypercholesterolemia, premature atherosclerosis, extensive xanthoma, and arthralgia-tenosynovitis. Successive misdiagnoses of Evans syndrome and familial hypercholesterolemia had been made, and the patient had responded minimally to steroid therapy, splenectomy, and statin treatment; therefore, she was referred to our hospital. On admission, a peripheral blood smear revealed the presence of abnormally shaped erythrocytes and giant platelets. Multiple atherosclerotic lesions, sites of tenosynovitis, and carotid sheath xanthomas were identified on ultrasonography. Compound heterozygous mutations of the ABCG5 gene, including a hot variant (c.1,336, exon10 C>T, p.(R446*)) and a novel variant (c.1,325-3(IVS9)_c.1325-2(IVS9)delCA) were separately identified in her parents by pedigree analysis. Plant sterols analysis by high performance liquid chromatography method revealed remarkably elevated plasma plant sterol concentrations after drug withdrawal but reduced rapidly after restarting ezetimibe during follow-up period. After 21 months of treatment with ezetimibe and a low-plant sterol diet, her hematologic abnormalities, tenosynovitis, and hypercholesterolemia had significantly improved; and ultrasonography showed that her skin and carotid sheath xanthomas had resolved or shrunk. This case demonstrates that morphological changes in blood cells on a peripheral blood smear, ultrasonographic findings and ABCG5/ABCG8 gene screening are valuable, and plant sterol analysis in serum is crucial to confirm diagnosis and assess treatment adequacy for sitosterolemia.

Effect of PCSK9 inhibitors on pulse wave velocity and monocyte-to-HDL-cholesterol ratio in familial hypercholesterolemia subjects: results from a single-lipid-unit real-life setting.

AIMS: Subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are characterized by an increased amount of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) that promotes a continuous inflammatory stimulus. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of PCSK9-i on inflammatory biomarkers, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR), and on early atherosclerosis damage analyzed by pulse wave velocity (PWV) in a cohort of FH subjects. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we evaluated 56 FH subjects on high-intensity statins plus ezetimibe and with an off-target LDL-C. All subjects were placed on PCSK9-i therapy and obtained biochemical analysis as well as PWV evaluation at baseline and after six months of PCSK9-i therapy. RESULTS: After six months of add-on PCSK9-i therapy, only 42.9% of FH subjects attained LDL-C targets. As expected, a significant reduction of LDL-C (- 49.61%, p < 0.001) was observed after PCSK9-i therapy. Neutrophil count (NC) and MHR were reduced by PCSK9-i (-13.82% and -10.47%, respectively, p value for both < 0.05) and PWV significantly decreased after PCSK9-i therapy (- 20.4%, p < 0.05). Finally, simple regression analyses showed that ∆ PWV was significantly associated with ∆ LDL-C (p < 0.01), ∆ NC and ∆ MHR (p value for both < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, PCSK9-i therapy significantly improved lipid and inflammatory profiles and PWV values in FH subjects; our results support the positive effect of PCSK9-i in clinical practice.

Have We Learnt all from IMPROVE-IT? Part II. Subanalyses of the Effects of Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy on Selected Clinical and Laboratory Outcomes, Cost-Effectiveness, Guidelines, and Clinical Implications.

In this second part of the review of the IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT), the findings in relation to patients with stroke, the ACS phenotype, history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, heart failure, concurrent polyvascular atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and diabetes mellitus, and different levels of expression of selected cardiovascular biomarkers, are discussed. The combination therapy was proven safe, and drug discontinuation rates were not increased by adding ezetimibe. Since both statins and ezetimibe are now almost globally generically available, it can be concluded that for secondary prevention of ASCVD, adding ezetimibe to high-intensity statin therapy further reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and cardiovascular risk, cost-effectively.

The therapeutic management of South African dyslipidaemic patients at very high cardiovascular risk (CARDIO TRACK): a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Dyslipidaemia is a major modifiable risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. At the time the study was conducted, guidelines recommended a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of less than 1.8 mmol/l and a reduction of at least 50% if the baseline LDL-C was between 1.8 and 3.5 mmol/l in patients with either very high cardiovascular risk or established atherosclerosis. In South Africa, there is a paucity of data on attainment of LDL-C goal in patients with very high cardiovascular risk who are on maximum tolerated statin with or without ezetimibe. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the percentage of very high cardiovascular risk South African patients with dyslipidaemia not reaching an LDL-C goal of less than 1.8 mmol/l, despite maximum tolerated statin with or without ezetimibe. METHODS: This was a multi-centre, observational, cross-sectional study conducted at 15 private healthcare sector sites and one public sector site. Adults (> 18 years) with very high cardiovascular risk of familial hypercholesterolaemia receiving stable, maximum-tolerated statin therapy for at least four weeks prior to their latest lipid profile were enrolled into the study, and electronic case report forms were completed after written informed consent was provided. LDL-C goal attainment was modelled, first assuming an increase in the statin dose to the registered maximum, followed by the addition of ezetimibe or a PCSK9-inhibitor. RESULTS: In total, 507 patients were screened, of whom 492 were eligible for study participation. One patient was excluded from the analysis because of a missing LDL-C value. Most participants were male (male 329, 67%; female 162, 33%). Most patients were either obese (223, 46.0%) or overweight (176, 36.3%). Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were frequent co-morbidities and were found in 381 (77.6%) and 316 (64.4%) patients, respectively. Eighty (16.3%) patients reported current smoking. Only 68 (13.8%) patients were taking ezetimibe in addition to a statin. Reasons for not using ezetimibe included no requirement for ezetimibe in the opinion of the treating physician (229, 48.7%), cost (149, 31.7%), Physician's choice (39, 8.3%), or other (53, 11.3%). Only 161 (32.8%) of the patients attained their goal LDL-C level. In our modelling analysis, increasing the statin dose to the registered maximum and adding ezetimibe brought an additional 34.5% of patients to goal, while adding a PCSK9-inhibitor, irrespective of any other changes to lipid-lowering therapy brought over 90% of not-at-goal patients to goal. CONCLUSIONS: Most study participants were not at LDL-C goal despite maximum-tolerated statin, highlighting the need for treatment intensification in this high-risk population. Although intensifying treatment by adding a PCSK9-inhibitor brought more patients to goal, the initial addition of ezetimibe would be more reasonable, given the cost of PCSK9-inhibitors.

First national registry on the effectiveness and safety of evolocumab in clinical practice in patients attended in cardiology in Spain. The RETOSS-CARDIO study. / Primer registro nacional sobre la efectividad y seguridad de evolocumab en la práctica clínica en pacientes atendidos en cardiología en España. Estudio RETOSS-CARDIO.

OBJECTIVE: To present the first registry used to analyse the clinical profile of patients treated with evolocumab in Spain, including the effectiveness on the lipid profile and safety in the «real world¼ setting. METHODS: Multicentre, retrospective, and observational study of patients starting treatment with evolocumab from February 2016 to May 2017 in clinical practice in Spanish cardiology units. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients (mean age 60.3 ± 9.8 years were included, 35.5% with familial hypercholesterolaemia, and 94.1% with a previous cardiovascular event) from 31 cardiology units. Baseline lipid profile: Total cholesterol 219.4 ± 52.2 mg/dL, LDL-cholesterol 144.0 ± 49.0mg/dL, HDL-cholesterol 47.7 ± 13.0mg/dL, and triglycerides 151.0 ± 76.2mg/dL. At the time of initiating evolocumab, 53.8% of patients were taking statins (50% had partial or total intolerance to statins), and 51.1% ezetimibe. In all cases, the dose of evolocumab used was 140 mg, mainly every 2 weeks (97.3%). Evolocumab compliance was high (92.3%). Treatment with evolocumab was interrupted in 6 patients (3.2%), with only 1 (0.5%) due to a probable side effect. Evolocumab significantly reduced total cholesterol (30.9% at week 2, and 39.3% at week 12; P<.001), LDL cholesterol (44.4% and 57.6%, respectively; P<.001), and triglycerides (14.8% and 5.2%, respectively; P<001), with no significant changes in HDL-cholesterol (6.7% and 2.0%; P=.14). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, evolocumab is associated with reductions in LDL cholesterol, with nearly 60% after 12 weeks of treatment, and with low rates of interruptions due to side effects and high medication compliance. These results are consistent with those reported in randomised clinical trials.

New possible pharmacological targets for statins and ezetimibe.

Statin therapy is the gold standard in the treatment of dyslipidemia. Understanding the mechanisms of action of these drugs provides an opportunity to define new therapeutic goals for pharmacotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic lesions. The present review indicates the existence of previously unknown therapeutic targets for statins, such as Krüppel-like Factor 2 (KLF-2), Cystathionine γ lyase (CSE) and the microRNA regulating eNOS activity and synthesis; nuclear PXR receptor and EB transcription factor regulating Inflammasome NLRP3 activity; the Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK-1), which inhibits the WNT signalling pathway; the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR-γ) in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), which regulates the cell cycle, and the ERK5-Nrf2 pathway, which reduces the level of harmful advanced glycation end-products (AGE) in VSMCs during diabetic vasculopathy. Importantly, our review includes a number of promising discoveries, specifically those related to the effects of miR-221, miR-222 and miR-27b on the structure, synthesis and activity of eNOS, such as microRNA-based therapies, which offer promise in future targeted therapies. In contrast to numerous experiments confirming the pleiotropic effect of statins, there is still insufficient evidence on the pleiotropic effect of ezetimibe, which goes beyond its basic inhibitory effect on intestinal cholesterol absorption. However, recent studies indicate that this effect is limited to inhibiting macrophage migration, decreasing VCAM-1 expression and reducing the levels of reactive oxygen species. Defining new therapeutic goals for pharmacotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic lesions and ensuring effective treatment of dyslipidemia and its associated cardiovascular complications requires a thorough understanding of both the mechanisms of action of these drugs and of atherosclerosis itself.

Short-course, direct-acting antivirals and ezetimibe to prevent HCV infection in recipients of organs from HCV-infected donors: a phase 3, single-centre, open-label study.

BACKGROUND: An increasing percentage of potential organ donors are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). After transplantation from an infected donor, establishment of HCV infection in uninfected recipients is near-universal, with the requirement for post-transplant antiviral treatment. The aim of this study was to determine if antiviral drugs combined with an HCV entry blocker given before and for 7 days after transplant would be safe and reduce the likelihood of HCV infection in recipients of organs from HCV-infected donors. METHODS: HCV-uninfected organ recipients without pre-existing liver disease were treated with ezetimibe (10 mg; an HCV entry inhibitor) and glecaprevir-pibrentasvir (300 mg/120 mg) before and after transplantation from HCV-infected donors aged younger than 70 years without co-infection with HIV, hepatitis B virus, or human T-cell leukaemia virus 1 or 2. Recipients received a single dose 6-12 h before transplant and once a day for 7 days after surgery (eight doses in total). HCV RNA was assessed once a day for 14 days and then once a week until 12 weeks post-transplant. The primary endpoint was prevention of chronic HCV infection, as evidenced by undetectable serum HCV RNA at 12 weeks after transplant, and assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety monitoring was according to routine post-transplant practice. 12-week data are reported for the first 30 patients. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04017338. The trial is closed to recruitment but follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: 30 patients (23 men and seven women; median age 61 years (IQR 48-66) received transplants (13 lung, ten kidney, six heart, and one kidney-pancreas) from 18 HCV-infected donors. The median donor viral load was 5·11 log10IU/mL (IQR 4·55-5·63) and at least three HCV genotypes were represented (nine [50%] donors with genotype 1, two [11%] with genotype 2, five [28%] with genotype 3, and two [11%] with unknown genotype). All 30 (100%) transplant recipients met the primary endpoint of undetectable HCV RNA at 12 weeks post-transplant, and were HCV RNA-negative at last follow-up (median 36 weeks post-transplant [IQR 25-47]). Low-level viraemia was transiently detectable in 21 (67%) of 30 recipients in the early post-transplant period but not after day 14. Treatment was well tolerated with no dose reductions or treatment discontinuations; 32 serious adverse events occurred in 20 (67%) recipients, with one grade 3 elevation in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) possibly related to treatment. Non-serious transient elevations in ALT and creatine kinase during the study dosing period resolved with treatment completion. Among the serious adverse events were two recipient deaths due to causes unrelated to study drug treatment (sepsis at 49 days and subarachnoid haemorrhage at 109 days post-transplant), with neither patient ever being viraemic for HCV. INTERPRETATION: Ezetimibe combined with glecaprevir-pibrentasvir given one dose before and for 7 days after transplant prevented the establishment of chronic HCV infection in recipients of different organs from HCV-infected donors. This study shows that an ultra-short course of direct-acting antivirals and ezetimibe can prevent the establishment of chronic HCV infection in the recipient, alleviating many of the concerns with transplanting organs from HCV-infected donors. FUNDING: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; the Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network.

A Review of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Bempedoic Acid in the Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia.

Despite the widespread use of statins and ezetimibe to decrease low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and associated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), many patients do not achieve adequate LDL-C lowering as per the recommended American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines and demonstrate residual cardiovascular risk. The introduction of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK-9) inhibitors in 2015 was a promising addition to hypercholesterolemia therapies, but their cost and subcutaneous administration has limited their use, and therefore, new affordable and patient friendly treatment strategies are crucial to help reduce ASCVD risk. Bempedoic acid, a drug currently under investigation, is a small molecule that has been shown to upregulate LDL receptors, decrease LDL-C, and reduce atherosclerotic plaque formation in hypercholesterolemic patients. Furthermore, bempedoic acid is a prodrug that becomes activated by an enzyme expressed primarily in the liver, allowing it to avoid the potential myotoxicity associated with statin therapy. The purpose of this review is to summarize the major clinical studies evaluating bempedoic acid and describe its potential addition to currently approved lipid-lowering therapies.

What Does the Future Hold for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis?

Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD), the most common liver disease, is characterized by accumulation of fat (>5% of the liver tissue), in the absence of alcohol abuse or other chronic liver diseases. Its prevalence is increasing because of obesity, metabolic syndrome or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). NAFLD can cause liver inflammation and progress to Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis, cirrhosis or Hepatocellular Cancer (HCC). Nevertheless, Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) is the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in NAFLD/NASH patients. Current guidelines suggest the use of pioglitazone both in patients with T2DM and in those without. The newer antidiabetic drugs such as Glucagon Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RA), Sodium-Glucose co- Transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and statins plus ezetimibe, are considered safe by the guidelines, and may have a beneficial effect on NAFLD/NASH as well as Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Future drugs seem to have a potential for holding down the evolution of NAFLD and reduce liver- and CVD-related morbidity and mortality, but they will take some years to be approved for routine use. Until then pioglitazone, GLP-1 RA, SGLT2i, and statins plus ezetimibe, especially in combination might be useful for treating the huge number of patients with NAFLD/NASH.

Medication Adherence/Persistence and Demographics of Japanese Dyslipidemia Patients on Statin-Ezetimibe as a Separate Pill Combination Lipid-Lowering Therapy　- An Observational Pharmacy Claims Database Study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify potential predictors of medication adherence and persistence with statin-ezetimibe combinational lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) as a separate pill combination in a real-world setting in Japan.Methods and Results:Patients newly switched to statin-ezetimibe combinational LLT from statin monotherapy were identified within a Japanese national pharmacy claims database during January 2015 to April 2018. Adherence and persistence were measured by the proportion of days covered (PDC), time to treatment discontinuation and persistence rate at 1 year. A stepwise multivariate logistic regression model and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to explore potential predictors associated with adherence and persistence, respectively. Among 6,921 patients, 71.9% were adherent (PDC ≥80%), and 83.6% were persistent at 1 year after initiation. Patients aged ≤54 years and ≥75 years were prone to be more non-adherent. Secondary prevention was associated with better adherence and longer persistence. Concomitant use of medications for depression/anxiety was associated with shorter persistence, whereas use of antihypertensive drugs was associated with better adherence and persistence. CONCLUSIONS: Age, concomitant use of certain classes of medications (or the existence of these diseases) and secondary prevention were associated with adherence and persistence of statin-ezetimibe combinational LLT. Given that dyslipidemia is a chronic disease requiring life-long control, active interventions are required for patients with poor adherence and persistence.

Ezetimibe for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality events.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains an important cause of mortality and morbidity, and high levels of blood cholesterol are thought to be the major modifiable risk factors for CVD. The use of statins is the preferred treatment strategy for the prevention of CVD, but some people at high-risk for CVD are intolerant to statin therapy or unable to achieve their treatment goals with the maximal recommended doses of statin. Ezetimibe is a selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor, whether it has a positive effect on CVD events remains uncertain. Results from clinical studies are inconsistent and a thorough evaluation of its efficacy and safety for the prevention of CVD and mortality is necessary. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe for the prevention of CVD and all-cause mortality. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science on 27 June 2018, and two clinical trial registry platforms on 11 July 2018. We checked reference lists from primary studies and review articles for additional studies. No language restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared ezetimibe versus placebo or ezetimibe plus other lipid-modifying drugs versus other lipid-modifying drugs alone in adults, with or without CVD, and which had a follow-up of at least 12 months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and contacted trialists to obtain missing data. We performed statistical analyses according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and used the GRADE to assess the quality of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included 26 RCTs randomising 23,499 participants. All included studies assessed effects of ezetimibe plus other lipid-modifying drugs compared with other lipid-modifying drugs alone or plus placebo. Our findings were driven by the largest study (IMPROVE-IT), which had weights ranging from 41.5% to 98.4% in the different meta-analyses.Ezetimibe with statins probably reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with statins alone (risk ratio (RR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90 to 0.98; a decrease from 284/1000 to 267/1000, 95% CI 256 to 278; 21,727 participants; 10 studies; moderate-quality evidence). Trials reporting all-cause mortality used ezetimibe with statin or fenofibrate and found they have little or no effect on this outcome (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.05; 21,222 participants; 8 studies; high-quality evidence). Adding ezetimibe to statins probably reduces the risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.95; a decrease from 105/1000 to 92/1000, 95% CI 85 to 100; 21,145 participants; 6 studies; moderate-quality evidence) and non-fatal stroke (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.97; a decrease 32/1000 to 27/1000, 95% CI 23 to 31; 21,205 participants; 6 studies; moderate-quality evidence). Trials reporting cardiovascular mortality added ezetimibe to statin or fenofibrate, probably having little or no effect on this outcome (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.12; 19457 participants; 6 studies; moderate-quality evidence). The need for coronary revascularisation might be reduced by adding ezetimibe to statin (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.99; a decrease from 196/1000 to 184/1000, 95% 175 to 194; 21,323 participants; 7 studies); however, no difference in coronary revascularisation rate was observed when a sensitivity analysis was limited to studies with a low risk of bias.In terms of safety, adding ezetimibe to statins may make little or no difference in the risk of hepatopathy (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.35; 20,687 participants; 4 studies; low-quality evidence). It is uncertain whether ezetimibe increase or decrease the risk of myopathy (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.38; 20,581 participants; 3 studies; very low-quality evidence) and rhabdomyolysis, given the wide CIs and low event rate. Little or no difference in the risk of cancer, gallbladder-related disease and discontinuation due to adverse events were observed between treatment groups. For serum lipids, adding ezetimibe to statin or fenofibrate might further reduce the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol and triglyceride levels and likely increase the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels; however, substantial heterogeneity was detected in most analyses.None of the included studies reported on health-related quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Moderate- to high-quality evidence suggests that ezetimibe has modest beneficial effects on the risk of CVD endpoints, primarily driven by a reduction in non-fatal MI and non-fatal stroke, but it has little or no effect on clinical fatal endpoints. The cardiovascular benefit of ezetimibe might involve the reduction of LDL-C, total cholesterol and triglycerides. There is insufficient evidence to determine whether ezetimibe increases the risk of adverse events due to the low and very low quality of the evidence. The evidence for beneficial effects was mainly obtained from individuals with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD, predominantly with acute coronary syndrome) administered ezetimibe plus statins. However, there is limited evidence regarding the role of ezetimibe in primary prevention and the effects of ezetimibe monotherapy in the prevention of CVD, and these topics thus requires further investigation.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Although Identification Advances, Appreciation and Treatment Lag.

Familial hypercholesterolemia is one of the most common autosomal dominant inherited genetic disorders, yet it is frequently undiagnosed, leading to a markedly increased risk for cardiovascular events. Understanding the pathophysiology of the disease as well as the importance of cascade screening is critical to appropriate treatment of patients. Though the mainstay of therapy for heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia remains statins, many patients require additional therapy including ezetimibe and/or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) antibodies to achieve adequate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering. Access to PCSK9 inhibitors remains a significant clinical problem.

Using genetics to explore whether the cholesterol-lowering drug ezetimibe may cause an increased risk of cancer.

Background: Results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have raised concern that the cholesterol-lowering drug ezetimibe might increase the risk of cancer. We tested the hypothesis that genetic variation in NPC1L1, mimicking treatment with ezetimibe, was associated with an increased risk of cancer. Methods: We included 67 257 individuals from the general population. Of these, 8333 developed cancer and 2057 died of cancer from 1968 to 2011. To mimic the effect of ezetimibe, we calculated weighted allele scores based on the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-lowering(= NPC1L1-inhibitory) effect of each variant. We tested the associations of the NPC1L1 allele scores with LDL cholesterol and with risk of any cancer, death from any cancer and 27 site-specific cancers. As a positive control, we tested the association of the NPC1L1 allele scores with risk of ischaemic vascular disease (IVD). Results: The NPC1L1 allele scores did not associate with risk of any cancer, death from any cancer or with any of 27 site-specific cancers. Hazard ratios (HRs) for a 1-unit increase in internally weighted allele scores were 1.00 (95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.02) for any cancer, and 1.02 (0.98-1.06) for cancer death. The corresponding HR for IVD was 0.97 (0.94-0.99). Results were similar for an externally weighted allele score and for a simple allele count. Finally, the null association with cancer was robust in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Lifelong, genetic inhibition of NPC1L1, mimicking treatment with ezetimibe, does not associate with risk of cancer. These results suggest that long-term treatment with ezetimibe is unlikely to increase the risk of cancer, in agreement with the overall evidence from ezetimibe RCTs.